First
Sentence: Do you know me?
Journalist Mercer Hennessy struggles daily
with the loss of her husband and child who died in an automobile accident. Reminiscent
of the Casey Anthony case, Ashlyn Bryant is about to go on trial for the murder
of her daughter Tasha Nicole, yet she swears she is innocent. Believing Ashlyn is guilty, Mercer accepts
the assignment from her editor Katherine Craft to watch a live courtroom feed
and write an "instant book" about the trial to be released as soon as
the verdict is pronounced. When events don't go as planned, Mercer attempts to
learn what is true.
Breaking this book down by the elements
and beginning with its hook, there is no question but that the opening captures
one's attention. The pain and grief
conveyed in the opening are palpable and relatable to anyone who has
experienced extreme loss, as well as the pain of being left behind—"Dex
will never be thirty-six. Sophie will
never be four. Tasha Nicole Bryant will
never be three. I'll keep changing,
though. And keep wondering why."
More than that, one is able to empathize with Mercer and the stages through
which she goes throughout the story. Ryan's perspective on the balance
of life rings so true—"We live in such a fragile equilibrium. When one thing changes, everything else has
to readjust, same as when a new person steps onto an elevator. People move, shift positions, make sure that
the remaining room is properly allocated."
What is nice is that in the midst of the
sorrow and drama, there is Voice; this character who is only heard, never seen
until the very end, who provides touches of light amongst the darkness, and
normalcy within the drama—"'You need coffee?' Voice asks. As if he's talking to me. 'Praise this
morning's delay, team, you've still got fifteen minutes.' 'Thanks, Voice,' I say. 'Good idea.'"
This truly is a book of two parts. In the first part, Ryan once again proves
that well-written courtroom scenes can be as suspenseful as any other type of
confrontation. What sets these scenes
apart is that the protagonist is neither in the actual courtroom nor personally
involved with the hearing. Yet while
Mercer is watching the trial remotely, one is envisioning it, and it
works. Although the end of Part 1 is
rather expected, it does leave one wondering as to where the story is headed.
Part 2 takes a major turn and one quickly
realizes how subjective is the truth, and how effectively Ryan has done her
job. Even Mercer muses that--“Maybe we never know that truth, since
it’s so inescapably transformed by our own point of view.” True to the title, one has
incorporated Mercer's views into one's own despite the internal thoughts of
"But wait" creating doubt.
Ryan has caused one to not want the answers to those doubts even though
they are necessary. The bigger question
is whether one can "trust" the author.
There is so much which cannot be said for fear of any
spoilers. What can be said is that the story within the story is
incredibly twisty. Part 1 is approximately the first half of the book and
it's excellent. Parts 2 and 3 take one down the rabbit hole as we start
to lose faith in the protagonist. We know she is vulnerable; we don't
expect her to be naïve. There is also quite a bit of redundancy.
Does the story seem overly long? Yes; 50-100 fewer pages might have increased
the tension of the story. Still, the book is a fairly quick read, although
one may find oneself skimming a fair amount in the latter two parts.
Was the ending satisfactory? It depends.
There is a major thread left dangling. For those who prefer feeling
justice has been served, as usually found in most police procedurals,
traditional, and cozy mysteries, and although one knows justice isn't a given, the
end is frustrating. However, it may not bother those who enjoy psychological
suspense and don't mind an unresolved or ambiguous ending.
"Trust Me" is twisty,
psychological suspense. It's not perfect, but the very end and the
epilogue make up for quite a lot.
TRUST ME (Psy Susp-Mercer
Hennessy-Boston-Contemp) - Good
Ryan, Hank Phillippi - Standalone
Forge Books – Aug 2018
Hmm...interesting. I can enjoy an ambiguous ending, depending on what the circumstances are, and how well it's done. And it does sound as though there are some interesting characters here. I give Ryan credit for not doing 'the usual.'
ReplyDelete